[Yak] why I prefer US cycle paths
John S. Allen
jsallen at bikexprt.com
Fri Apr 3 22:02:30 CDT 2009
At 07:27 PM 4/3/2009, Jym Dyer wrote:
>=v= So we went through a gazillion messages about the eeevils
>of helmet use or nonuse. Now are we to go through a gazillion
>messages about the eeevils of bike facilities?
Well, I hope not, but if so, you have just written one of those messages!
>=v= Some topics just never get tiresome. No, wait, the other
>one: Some topics have been tiresome for decades.
The issue is not good or evil of Bicycle Facilities as a general
category, as you appear to have framed it and as people on both sides
of the flame wars that both you and I would like to avoid tend to
frame it. Some facilities are good, useful, safe, and others, such as
the two I described are decidedly evil, because they give the initial
appearance of being much safer than they are to the casual bicyclists
who come to ride on them.
What is really tiresome is that bad facilities get built, and that
people get injured and killed riding on them. The public deserves to
be informed and to develop its discerning judgment.
John S. Allen
jsallen *at* bikexprt.com
http://bikexprt.com
More information about the Yak
mailing list